Financial requirements – it isn’t over yet

By | financial requirements, immigration, marriage | No Comments

The current financial requirements, which require a UK based sponsor to show an annual income of £18,600 before he or she can sponsor a partner from overseas, were brought in on 09 July 2012, and have been the cause of much controversy since.  Challenged successfully in the High Court, who ruled that the requirement was unlawful, the Home Office reacted by taking the matter to the Court of Appeal, meanwhile putting all applications that did not meet the financial requirements on hold – in March 2014, this was some 3,641.

In July 2014 the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Home Office, and all the applications that were on hold, and any others where the financial requirements were not met, in precisely the way that the Immigration Rules specify, were refused and have continued to be refused.  Now, 10 months after that judgement, comes a glimmer of hope – the case is to go before the Supreme Court.  No date has been set as yet, and it is likely to be many months before the matter is heard, and some months after that before a judgement is released.  Meanwhile the financial requirements stand as they are, but there is, somewhere at the end of a very long tunnel, a glimmer of hope ….

Are you affected by the financial requirements?  Sign up for updates and find out about changes as soon as we do.

We hate spam and will never sell your email address.  Read our privacy policy here.

Minister admits spouse migration rules are ‘unfair’ to British citizens

By | EEA, financial requirements, marriage | No Comments

eu-flag-800x450An interesting ‘news’ story from the BBC earlier this week:

When Keith Vaz, the chair of the Home Affairs Committee, pointed out that British citizens have to earn £18,600 per year before they can bring their spouses in, while EEA nationals have no such requirement to show minimum earnings, James Brokenshire, Minister of State for Immigration at the Home Office, acknowledged the unfairness of this, announcing it to be ‘unacceptable’ and needing ‘to be addressed’.

If you are one of the thousands of people who has been kept apart from their loved ones because of the new financial requirements, however, don’t get your hopes up that this signifies a softening in the government’s position  – Mr. Brokenshire appears to regard this as a ‘loophole’ that European nationals are taking advantage of and which he means to close, presumably meaning that everyone, British or European, would have to meet the minimum earnings requirement.

He is quoted as saying that he ‘plans to raise it with Britain’s EU partners’, thereby giving the impression of talking tough while in reality he must surely know that there is no chance at all that any minimum earnings requirement would be accepted by the European Commission, as this would be a clear breach of the right of free movement.

The BBC story is here.

Giving notice of marriage

By | marriage, procedural changes | No Comments

Overstayers-EEAFrom 2 March 2015, everyone getting married in England or Wales will have to give 28 days notice at the Registry Office or in an Anglican church. And the authorities will be obliged to refer all such notices to the Home Office in cases where one or both parties are not:

  • British citizens
  • People with Indefinite Leave to Remain in the UK
  • EEA nationals with the right of permanent residence in the UK
  • Holders of visas allowing them to get married (eg a fiancé visa)
  • Exempt from immigration control

The Home Office can extend this notice period up to 70 days to investigate whether they consider the marriage to be a ‘sham marriage’ just for immigration purposes.  And if you don’t cooperate with the investigation, you won’t be allowed to marry.

We can’t see how this is different from the Certificate of Approval scheme that ran between 2004 and 2011, which required anyone getting married in the UK who was not a British or European citizen, or a person with Indefinite Leave, to get Home Office permission (at a fee) before marrying in a Registry Office.  That scheme (ruled illegal by the House of Lords in 2008, not not abolished until 2011) and this one are the Home Office’s response to the problem of sham marriages – defined as being marriages entered into by a couple who are not in a genuine relationship in order to obtain an immigration advantage for one or both of them.

eu-flag-800x450The Home Office see this as a major problem, especially where an EEA national is involved, as once married the non-EEA national spouse has an automatic right to live and work in the UK, and many European nationals and their spouses have been invited for interview (usually in Liverpool and usually at 9:oo AM, regardless of where in the UK they live) where they are questioned separately (and rather aggressively according to many reports) on the minutiae of their daily lives, in the hope of identifying enough contradictions to justify a refusal of their Residence Card application.

So, how will the new regime work?  According to Home Office estimates:

35,000 marriages per year will be reported to the Home Office, of which 6,000 – 10,000 will be sham marriages

That is, between a quarter and a third of marriages where one or the other of the parties is not settled in the UK are, according to the Home Office, ‘sham marriages’.  And their plan to combat this?  The Home Office say that they have the capacity to investigate 6,000 cases per year, though we understand that there will be a staff of 20 doing this.  That’s:

6,000 cases ÷ 20 caseworkers = 300 cases per caseworker per year

Did anyone say backlog?!

It’s not clear exactly how the new arrangements will operate in practice, so we will wait with interest to see exactly how many marriages are investigated and how long this takes. The Home Office envisage an increase in judicial reviews and appeals against enforcement action, which will also mean an increase in the fees payable, so it’s a win-win situation for them.

And, of course, their impact assessment includes one of the usual suspects, ‘increased employment opportunities for UK residents’, on the basis that the job occupied by an overseas national in a sham marriage who is removed from the UK will be available to a UK resident.